Aonly ordinary appeal currently and the substantive resolution of the case depends on the clarification of the legal issue that is the subject of the preliminary question under the conditions in which the defendant FA was convicted in the first instance for committing a crime of drug trafficking in a continuous form provided by art. para. and from Law no. republished with subsequent amendments and additions with the application of art. para. of the Criminal Code after the legal classification of the facts held in his charge by the courts referral act had previously been changed respectively three offenses provided for by art. para. from Law no. republished with.
Subsequent amendments and additions and an offense Country Email List provided for by art. para. and from Law no. republished with subsequent amendments and additions. Also the Court found that the High Court of Cassation and Justice did not rule through a prior decision on the question of law nor through an appeal in the interest of the law and it is not currently the subject of such an appeal. . Regarding the legal issue that forms the object of the notification Bucharest Court of Appeal Second.
Criminal Section in the majority opinion showed that the expression of a point of view on the legal issue that is the subject of the referral to the Supreme Court represents a prepronouncement in the conditions in which the precisely of the legal issue whose clarification is requested through the preliminary question. IV. The partys point of view regarding the resolution of the legal issue The accused appellant FA through the chosen defender expressed himself in writing according to the provisions of art. para. of the Criminal Procedure Code the opinion showing in essence that in the interpretation of the provisions of art. of Law no. on.
發表於 2023-12-27 16:34:40
