|
|
Eustaquio Villalba, spokesperson for the Association of Friends of Nature, points out that the CC-PP Government has privileged the interests of "those who want to enrich themselves with the environment of the islands." Environmental organizations will take to court the file of the sanctioning file against the Cuna del Alma urbanization, in the Tenerife municipality of Adeje, according to Eustaquio Villalba, spokesperson for the Association of Friends of Nature. Villalba considers that, with the filing of the file and the lifting of the order to stop the works, the current officials of the Canary Islands Government, the Canarian Coalition and the Popular Party, demonstrate that "they have no idea about Canarian culture and heritage and they consider "On top of that, the private interest of people who want to enrich themselves with the environment of the islands." In his criticism he does not want to leave out the PSOE, which is the party that governs in Adeje and that has defended, at all times, the project.
Judicial decisions It indicates that they will go to court because the Canary Islands Government has not presented any arguments regarding the infractions that have been reported. Likewise, he remembers that there are two other additional files, for affecting the archaeological heritage and for the presence of the sad viper, in which there are already judicial decisions that support the Europe Mobile Number List stoppage Grow to infinity Villalba rejects the arguments that the project will create jobs, something that was already said with the Port of Granadilla "without that happening." Furthermore, he affirms that this is an "absurd" approach because it implies that the economy can grow "in any way and infinitely."María Monserrat Ortega, executive director of the agency dependent on the Government of the Canary Islands, points out that the procedure has followed all legal guarantees. The Canarian Agency for the Protection of the Natural Environment defends the filing of the file on the Cuna del Alma urban development project because it is the legal route that proceeds in view of the documentation provided, according to its executive director, María Monserrat Ortega.
Indicates that the sanctioning procedure was opened by virtue of an alleged violation of the Environmental Protection Law, with a certain period to process it and that, in the first instance, it was resolved by maintaining the suspension and establishing a sanction. This decision was appealed and dismissed. Validity of the documentation provided It indicates that, from there, the Adeje City Council made a request defending the validity of the documentation provided. Likewise, the legal report of the Government of the Canary Islands indicates that the City Council provided sufficient documentation at an environmental level, and if it is not considered legitimate, that title must be challenged by another means, not through the Agency. Legal prudence In view of these documents, the Agency has understood that it was not appropriate to continue with the procedure, archive it and lift all the measures that have been agreed upon in the course of the file: "This is what legal prudence dictates." Ortega points out that it is not up to the Agency to decide if the works should continue as is or if the City Council is going to require any additional documentation.
|
|
發表於 2024-3-9 13:58:35